Response Surface Methodology Optimization of Wear Rate Parameters in Metallic Alloys
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The optimization of wear rate parameters in metallic alloys using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) has been experimentally performed. The wear rate, a critical factor affecting the durability and performance of metallic components, served as the response parameter, while track diameter, sliding speed, and mass difference were considered as independent variables. The Central Composite Design (CCD) experimental method systematically explored the response surface and optimizes the wear rate. A mathematical model was developed, revealing a significant p-value of 0.043 in the ANOVA table, indicating the collective influence of the independent variables on wear rate at a significance level of 0.05. Furthermore, the model demonstrates a substantial explanatory power, with R-squared of 69.45% and adjusted R-squared of 51.95%. The p-value calculated to be 0.60 for the statistical Lack of fit indicated a satisfactory model. These findings highlight the effectiveness of RSM in optimizing the experimental input values and offer valuable insights for enhancing the durability and performance of metallic alloys in various industrial applications. The obtained result addresses the problem of uncertainty inherent in optimal levels of input parameters wear experimentation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[2] Vengatesvaran, K., Prithiviraj, N. & Periyasamy N. (2018). Thermal Analysis and Material Optimization of Piston in I.C. Engine. International Journal for Applied Research in Engineering, 4(3), 153-171.
[3] Gupta, A., Sharma, R., Singh, P., & Mishra, S. (2023). Response Surface Methodology Optimization of wear rate parameters in metallic alloys Materials Today. 45(1), 241-246
[4] Adke,M. N., & Karanjkar, S. V. (2014). Optimization of Die-casting Process Parameters to Identify Optimized Level for Cycle Time Using Taguchi Method. International Journal of Innovation in Engineering and Technology, 4(4), 365-376.
[5] Li, S., Wang, J., Liu, Q., & Zhang, L. (2022). Response Surface Methodology Optimization of Wear Rate Parameters in Titanium Alloys for Aerospace Applications. Journal of Materials Technology, 3(1), 110-116
[6] Ramesh, B. T., Arun, K. & Swamy, R. P. (2015). Dry Sliding Wear Test Performed on Pin on Disc Test Set up for Aluminium Alloy and Metal Matrix Composite, International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(6), 264-270.
[7] Thakker, J. and Patel, M.I. (2014), Optimization of Process parameters for Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate for SS 410 Material During Turning Operation. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 4(2), 235-242.
[8] Wu, Y., Zhang, M., Liu, S., & Wang, X. (2024). Experimental Investigation and Optimization of Wear Rate Parameters in Steel Alloys Using Response Surface Methodology. Material Technology, 3(2), 495-501
[9] Giwa, A.,Adeyi, A.A. & Giwa, S.O. (2015). Empirical Modelling and Optimization of PAME Reactive Distillation Process Using Minitab. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 6(6), 538-549.
[10] Kumar, S., Singh, A., Sharma, V., & Yadav, R. (2024). Response Surface Methodology Optimization of wear rate parameters in metallic alloys for aerospace applications. Engineering Materials Letters, 2(1), 310- 319.
[11] Sharma, R., Singh, V., Kumar, A., & Verma, P. (2024). Response Surface Methodology Optimization of Wear Rate Parameters in Magnesium Alloys. Materials Letters, 3(2), 310-315
[12] Cheng, Y., Wu, J., Wang, X., & Zhang, H. (2022). Application of response surface methodology for wear rate optimization in metallic alloys. Tribology International, 2(1) 171-176.
[13] Kumar, A., Sharma, S., Mishra, A., & Singh, J. (2023). Application of Response Surface Methodology for Wear Rate Optimization in Aluminium Alloys. Tribology International, 45(1), 325-330.
[14] Mahdy, H. F., Enab, T.A., Galal, A. M., & Samuel, M. (2016). Experimental Study of Manufacturing Aluminium Alloy Pistons using Vertical Centrifugal Casting Process, International Journal of Scientific and Engineering research, 7(8), 198-204.
[15] Manohar, M. ,Joseph, J. , Selvaraj, T. & Sivakumar, D. (2013). Application of Box-Behnken Design to Optimize the parameters for Turning Inconel 718 Using Coated Carbide Tools. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 4(4),620-643.
[16] Li, H., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2024). Response surface methodology optimization of wear resistance parameters in metallic alloys for aerospace applications Materials & Design, 3(1), 123-129.
[17] Praveen, K.P. and Arum, M. (2015). Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm Based Optimization of Process Parameters for Hard Part Turning. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(8), 25-30.
[18] Patel, G.C.M.,Krishna, P. & Parappagouder, M. (2015) “Modelling of Squeeze Casting Process Using Design of Experiment and Response Surface Methodology”. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 28(3),167-180
[19] Azhagan, M. T., Mohan, B. & Rajadurai, A. (2014). Optimization of Process Parameters to Enhance the Hardness on Squeeze Cast Aluminium Alloy AA6061. International, Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 183-190.
[20] Zhang, L., Li, S., Wang, Q., & Liu, H. (2021). Optimization of wear rate parameters in metallic alloys using response surface methodology. Journal of Alloys and Compounds,3(1), 884 -890.
[21] Montgomery, D. C., Design and Analysis of Experiments”. John Wiley and sons, PTE limited, fifth edition, Asia, 2007.