The Legislature in the Nerves of Socio-Economic Governance and Development: The Nigerian National Assembly in Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
In modern democracies, government is typically structured around the tripod of the legislative, executive, and judicial arms. However, a common misconception exists that, among these three arms, only the executive significantly contributes to a nation's socio-economic development. This misconception is particularly prevalent in Nigeria, where awareness of the substantial contributions made by the legislative arm is lacking. This study reveals that the National Assembly of Nigeria, endowed with numerous powers and functions as stipulated by the constitution, plays a crucial role in the nerves of the nation's socio-economic development. These powers encompass law-making, representation, oversight, and constituency services. An evaluation of the National Assembly's roles, specifically its constitutionally assigned roles, indicates substantial contributions to the nation's socio-economic development. The findings underscore the National Assembly's impactful initiatives, such as combating corruption through establishing commissions like the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offenses Commission (ICPC). Additionally, efforts in rehabilitating regions affected by militant groups and terrorists, achieved through commissions like the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) and the Northeast Development Commission (NEDC), are evidence of its developmental strides. The National Assembly's legislative acts have also positively changed the educational sector and electoral system. The study acknowledges the National Assembly's commendable role in addressing and managing diversities and its active involvement in various constituency services. However, it identifies impediments that hinder optimal performance, including executive dominance, disconnection from society, inadequate laws supporting institutional functions, lack of political will, and insufficient training for legislators and supporting staff. Recognising these challenges as surmountable, the study proposes an agenda for reforming its institutional responsibilities. Recommendations include strengthening relevant laws to fortify the institution, encouraging legislators to develop the political will necessary for effective oversight, implementing comprehensive training and re-training programmes for legislators and support staff, and minimising legislators' turnover to capitalise on accumulated experiences. The study concludes with the belief that addressing these constraints will pave the way for enhanced performances by the National Assembly, ultimately contributing to the overall betterment of the country.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors hold the copyright of all published articles except otherwise stated.
References
Ahmadu, R. A. and Ajiboye, N. (2004). A Handbook on Legislative Practice and Procedure of the National Assembly. Abuja: National Secretariat of Nigerian Legislatures National Assembly Abuja.
Ayoade, J. A. (2003). Managing Democratic Intrigues in the Legislature: A paper presented at a Three-Day workshop organised by the Legislative Information and Research Centre, Osogbo 15th-17th December 2003.
Egbewole, W. O. (2003). Oversight Functions of the Legislature in Nigeria: An overview of a paper presented at a three-day workshop, organised by Legislative Information and Research Centre, Osogbo. 15th – 17th December 2005.
Erskine M. (1997). Parliamentary Practice, 22ndEd. Butterworth, London, 1997.
Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2019). The Constitution, of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Ministry of Information, Abuja.
Garner, J.W. 1952. Political Science and Government. Calcutta: World Press. Institute of Governance Social Research (IGRS) (2005). Training Manual: Orientation/Capacity Building workshop on “The challenges of the legislature in Nigeria’s Democratic Polity” Sponsor: European Union/Federal Government of Nigeria Democratic Programme Organiser Date: June 23- 26, 2005 Zaranda Hotel, Bauch.
Nakamura, R., & Johnson, J (2003). “Rising Legislative Assertiveness in Uganda and Kenya.” A paper delivered at the International Political Science Association. Durban, South Africa: 2003.
Ornstein, Norman. (1992). The Role of the Legislature in Democracy, Freedom Paper No. 3, available in the Legislature and Governance in Nigeria, Volume 1, Page 1 2014, Edited by Emmanuel O. Ojo.
Ogalo, H. and Wandera, D. (2003). “Oversight and the Role of Members of Parliament” presented at SADC PF Parliamentary Professional Performance and Development. Seminar; Maseru Lesotho: 29 September - 1 October 2003.
Ojo T. I. 1997. The Nigerian Legislature: A Historical Survey, Vol III. ASCON.Olanrewaju N.A. (2008). Telecommunications and National Development. International Journal of Gender and Development, Volume 8 Numbers 1&2.
Olaopa, T. (2014). Legislature and Imperative of the Democratic Process in Nigeria: Challenges and Condition of Reform. In Ojo, E and Omotola S. 2014 ed. The Legislature and Governance in Nigeria. Ibadan: John Archer Publishers.
Omotola J. S, (2014). The Legislature in Democratic Theory: Nigeria in Comparative Perspective. In Ojo, E and Omotola S. 2014 ed. The Legislature and Governance in Nigeria. Ibadan: John Archer Publishers.
Norton, P. (2007). Adding Value? The Role of the Second Chambers. Asian Pacific Law Review, Volume 15(1) 8.
Salih M., (2005). African Parliament: Between Governance and Government. New York Palgrave Macmillian.
Egbewole, W. (2003). A Critical Analysis of Legislative Oversight Function in a Constitutional Development. A paper presented at a three-day workshop sponsored by Osun State House of Assembly Osogbo on 15th-17th December 2003 and organised by the Legislative Information and Research Centre, Osogbo.