Reflections on Conducting Field Research on Women in Polarised Post-Conflict Communities in Plateau State, Nigeria
Main Article Content
Abstract
Due to the fragile nature of peace in polarised post-conflict communities, conducting qualitative phenomenological research on women in such communities is not easy for researchers. Consequently, conducting fieldwork in such a location requires adequate and thorough planning before proceeding to the field. In this article, the authors shared their common experiences of conducting research on women in polarised post-conflict communities. This article emphasised on the need for a researcher to establish multiple initial contacts with persons in the research locations, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), and/or Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) that have done some work or are currently working in the locations. The contacts can provide useful insights about the nature of the research locations, the potential participants, and the sensitivities. The article shows that when conducting interviews and Focused Group Discussions (FGDs), the researcher should ensure the safety of both the researcher and the participants by choosing suitable times and safe locations. The article emphasised the need to ensure that ethical considerations should guide the research process. The researcher, in conducting the fieldwork, must ensure that continuous informed consent is obtained from the participants in the research process. This will ensure that the researcher “does no harm” to the participants. Trust building through confidentiality and anonymity should be guaranteed to the participants to build rapport to ensure their full participation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors hold the copyright of all published articles except otherwise stated.
References
Aliyu, A. A., Abdu, A. A., Rozilah, K., & David, M. (2015). Residential segregation
and existing neighbourhood pattern in Jos metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of
Natural Sciences Research, 5, 12-21.
Allmark, P., Boote, J., Chambers, E., Clarke, A., McDonnell, A., Thompson, A., &
Tod, A. M. (2009). Ethical issues in the use of in-depth interviews: literature
review and discussion. Research Ethics, 5(2), 48-54.
Babbie, E. R. (2011). The Basics of Social Research. CA, US: Cengage Learning.
Bulus, K. I., Bhatti F. and Beysoylu, C. (2020). Women’s Agency in Peacebuilding
in Polarised Post-Conflict Communities in Plateau State, Nigeria. Journal of
Politics and Law; Vol. 13, No. 2. 189-200.
Campbell, S. P. (2017) Ethics of Research in Conflict Environments. Journal of
Global Security Studies, doi:10.1093/jogss/ogw024.
Chappuis, F., & Krause, J. (2019). Research dilemmas in dangerous places.
In Secrecy and Methods in Security Research (pp. 112-125). Routledge.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Strategies for qualitative data analysis: Basics of
Qualitative Research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded
theory, 3.
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among
Five Approaches. London: Sage.
Dingji Maza, K., Koldaº, U., & Aksit, S. (2020). Challenges of combating terrorist
financing in the Lake Chad region: A case of Boko Haram. Sage Open, 10(2),
Dixit, M. (2012). Field research in conflict zones: Experience from India and Sierra
Leone. International Studies, 49(1-2), 133-150.
Ensign J. (2003) Ethical issues in qualitative health research with homeless youths.
Journal of Advance Nursing 2 43(1): 43-50.
Goodhand, J. (2000). Research in conflict zones: ethics and accountability. Forced
Migration Review, 8(4), 12-16.
Gray, D. E. (2009). Doing Research in the Real World, 2nd edition. London: Sage.
Grimm, J. (2018). “Authoritarian Middle East regimes don’t like academics – ask
Matthew Hedges”, 22 November, https://www.opendemocracy.net/jannisgrimm/ policing-research-shifting-tides-for-middle-east-studies-after-arabspring.
Hedges M. (2019) “An ally held me as a spy– and the West is complicit”, The
Atlantic, 25 January 2019, available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/
international/archive/2019/01/ matthew-hedges-uae-held-me-spy-westcomplicit/581200/ (Accessed 26 February 2023.
Lalor, J. G., Begley, C. M., and Devane, D. (2006). Exploring painful experiences:
impact of emotional narratives on members of a qualitative research
team. Journal of advanced nursing, 56(6), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/
j.1365-2648.2006.04039.x
Moss, S. M. (2015). Negotiations of identities in Rwanda, Zanzibar and Sudan:
Macro-level identity approaches and micro-level responses (Un-published
doctoral dissertation). Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of
Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Oliver, K. (2003). Subjectivity and subject position: The double meaning of
witnessing. Studies in Practical Philosophy, 3(2), 132-143.
Prior, M. (2018). Accomplishing “rapport” in qualitative research interviews:
Empathic moments in interaction. Applied Linguistics Review, 9(4), 487-511.
https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0029.
Reychler, L. and Langer A. (2006). Researching Peace Building Architecture,
Cahiers Internationale Betrekkingen En Vredesonderzoek Vol. 75, Jg. 24.
Leuven: Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies.
Sieber, J. E. (1993). The Ethics and Politics of Sensitive Research. In Researching
Sensitive Topics, eds. Claire M. Renzetti and Raymond M. Lee, 14-26.
Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Sin, C. H. (2005). Seeking informed consent: Reflections on research practice.
Sociology, 39(2), 277-294.
Wood, E. J. (2006). The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones.
Qualitative Sociology, 29, 373–386.