Regional Power Dynamics and Security Approaches: A Comparative Study of SADC and ECOWAS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines regional power dynamics and security approaches within two prominent African regional organisations: ECOWAS– Economic Community of West African States and the SADC– Southern African Development Community. Since Africa remains insecure due to internal conflicts, and terrorism, regional organisations have a vital role in stability. ECOWAS and SADC are particularly marked by their specific security mechanisms; however, they are located in different political, social and economic environments and thus perform differently in terms of management and resolution of conflict. Using the theoretical framework of power theory and the adoption of case study research design and content analysis, the research critically explores regional power dynamics and security approaches within SADC and ECOWAS. The findings reveal that while ECOWAS’s interventionist policies enable swift action, they sometimes face issues of sustainability and regional buy-in. In contrast, SADC’s consensus-driven approach promotes stability but can lead to prolonged conflict resolution processes. This study contributes to the broader discourse on regional security in Africa, highlighting the need for adaptable strategies that address both immediate threats and long-term stability in diverse geopolitical environments. The study concludes that while both SADC and ECOWAS employ different strategies in Western and Southern Africa, yet the approaches are similar in many ways. Consequently, the two organisations though having the common strategic object of creating stability at regional level have significantly different operating models defined by their respective historical, political and socio-economic circumstances. These differences define their security actions, the coordination of the states which are members of the union, and their performance in the handling of conflicts.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors hold the copyright of all published articles except otherwise stated.
References
Akuche, C. & Akindoyin, D. (2024). Elucidating the problems of service delivery in
the Nigerian local government system since the Fourth Republic. Kashere
Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2(2).
Afolabi, B. (2020). ECOWAS and preventive diplomacy in West Africa. Preventive
Diplomacy, Security, and Human Rights in West Africa, 45-75.
Akindoyin, D. (2024d). A critique of the impact of social media on governance in
Nigeria. Lead City Journal of the Social Science (LCJSS), 9(1).
Akindoyin, D. (2024b). Impacts of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict on food security in
Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of International Relations, Peace Studies and
Development, 9(1).
Akindoyin, D. & Akuche, C. (2023a). Analysis of development prospect and security
crisis in Nigeria. Lead City Journal of the Social Science (LCJSS), 8(2).
Akindoyin, D., & Badru, R. (2024c). A synopsis of the Nigerian democracy. Kashere
Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2(1).
Aleyomi, M. B. (2022). Major constraints for regional hegemony: Nigeria and South
Africa in perspective. Insight on Africa, 14(2), 139-157.
Abbondanza, G. & Wilkins, T. S. (2022). The Case for Awkward Powers. Awkward
Powers: Escaping Traditional Great and Middle Power Theory, 3-39.
Ateku, A. J., & Owusu-Mensah, I. (2023). Insecurity and regional actors’ role in
securing Africa: an analysis of the role of ECOWAS, SADC, and IGAD in
countering terrorism. In Solomon, H. & Cocodia, J. African Security in the
Anthropocene (pp. 145-164). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Bakalov, I. (2020). Setting soft power in motion: towards a dynamic conceptual
framework. European journal of international relations, 26(2), 495-517.
Cottiero, C. (2021). Staying Alive: Regional Integration Organisations and
Vulnerable Leaders. University of California, San Diego.
dos Santos, A. T. B. (2021). Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony in Latin America:
Alva in the Neoliberal World Order (Master’s thesis, Universidade de
Coimbra (Portugal).
Gill, B., & Huang, Y. (2023). Sources and limits of Chinese ‘soft power’. In Brown,
S. J. Goetzmann, W. N. & Ross, S. A. Survival (pp. 17-35). Routledge.
Khoo, N., & Qingmin, Z. (2021). ‘Mirror, mirror on the wall’: China and the concept
of multipolarity in the post-Cold War era. In Zala, B. National perspectives
on a multipolar order (pp. 21-41). Manchester University Press.
Marti, T. W. L. (2022). American Foreign Policy Power in the Post-Cold War Era:
The Experience of the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush Administrations
(Doctoral dissertation, University of Otago).
Martin, R. (2024). The sociology of power. Taylor & Francis.
Mediu, E. (2021). Nato and Russia in the Balkans, Power Struggle for Influence
between Two Security Zones. Case Studies of Albania, Montenegro, and
Croatia. Webster University.
Miles, S. (2024). We All Fall Down: The Dismantling of the Warsaw Pact and the
End of the Cold War in Eastern Europe. International Security, 48(3), 51-85.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). Politics Among Nations: The struggle for power and
peace (4th ed.). Knopf.
Munira, H. (2021). The Impact of Human Trafficking on Human Security in Africa:
Case Study of Kenya Uganda, Busia Border (Doctoral dissertation, University
of Nairobi).
Ng, J. I. (2021). The Unquenchable Fire: The Arms Trade and Reproduction of the
US Empire, 1960-1988 (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University).
Peou, S. (2021). Peace and security in Indo-Pacific Asia: IR perspectives in context.
Routledge.
Swenson, I. J. (2024). A Contemporary Re-evaluation of German Grand Strategy:
An Analysis of the Soft-Power Strategy (Doctoral dissertation).
Tsuprykova, O. (2020). Cultural diplomacy as a soft power tool in the 21st century.
Case study of Poland, Ukraine, and Russia.
Uriburu, J. (2024). Organising Peace in the Americas: Collective Security versus
International Adjudication. Journal of the History of International Law/
Revue d’histoire du droit international, 25(4), 592-618.